دعوے کے فیصلے کا بیان
راوی:
عَنْ جَمِيلِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ الْمُؤَذِّنِ أَنَّهُ کَانَ يَحْضُرُ عُمَرَ بْنَ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ وَهُوَ يَقْضِي بَيْنَ النَّاسِ فَإِذَا جَائَهُ الرَّجُلُ يَدَّعِي عَلَی الرَّجُلِ حَقًّا نَظَرَ فَإِنْ کَانَتْ بَيْنَهُمَا مُخَالَطَةٌ أَوْ مُلَابَسَةٌ أَحْلَفَ الَّذِي ادُّعِيَ عَلَيْهِ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَکُنْ شَيْئٌ مِنْ ذَلِکَ لَمْ يُحَلِّفْهُ
جمیل بن عبدالرحمن عمر بن عبدالعزیز کے پاس آیا کرتے تھے جب وہ فیصلہ کرتے تھے لوگوں کا جو شخص کسی پر دعوی کرے گو مدعی اور مدعا علیہ میں یک جائی اور تعلق اور تباط معلوم ہوتا تو مدعا علیہ سے حلف لیتے ورنہ حلف نہ لیتے ۔
Yahya said, "Malik said about Jamil ibn Abd ar-Rahman al-Muadhdin that he was present with Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz when he was judging between people. If a man came to him with a claim against a man, he examined whether or not there were frequent transactions and dealings between them. If there were, the defendant could make an oath. If there was nothing of that nature he did not accept an oath from him."
Malik summed up, "What is done in our community is that if some one makes a claim against a man, it is examined. If there are frequent transactions and dealings between them, the defendant is made to take an oath. If he takes an oath, the claim against him is dropped. If the defendant refuses to take an oath, and returns the oath to the claimant, the one claiming his right takes an oath and takes his due."